I’m sorry the site was out of action for a couple of days recently – I’ll do my best to ensure it doesn’t happen again.
Peter
Conscious Entities
If the conscious self is an illusion – who is it that's being fooled?
Search
Pages
Recent Comments
- How to reduce wrinkles: Hello! I'm at work surfing around your blog from my new iphone! Just wanted...
- Arnold Trehub: Vicente: "If I may insist in my metaphore, you need to modulate a carrier t...
- scott bakker: Vicente: The question is one of the difference between actually *apprehendi...
- Vicente: Arnold, to understand: "I am here" you have to know about yourself, about b...
- Mark Pharoah: I would like to correct you on the first sentence of your post where you de...
- Arnold Trehub: Vicente: "'being here' is already an extremely complex concept and feeling ...
- Vicente: Scott, I don't know... the "IT" is a common position, from Russel to the...
- Vicente: Arnold, a conscious being would have a sense of being here "
- Arnold Trehub: Vicente, a conscious being would have a sense of being here. A non-consciou...
- scott bakker: "I would have liked to ask Hume, who looks where? who feels what? Is it pos...
Alternative Angles
Astonishing Experiments
Bedtime Stories
Definitions
My Diagnosis - 1½ Answers
My Diagnosis - 3½ Problems
Pseudodoxia
Resources
Strange Ideas
RSS
- Dynamic Blogroll
- A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory
- Weatherson's Exactly Right about Blog Resucitation
- A Tetrachromat Has Been Found
- PEBS Neuroethics Roundup (JHU)
- "Australian University Students’ Attitudes Towards the Acceptability and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals to Improve Academic Performance"
- "Nueroscience and the Child Welfare System"
- Old schooled: You never stop learning like a child
- Renewing our brain's ability to make decisions.
- Now Available! Neuroethics Journal Club Video Archives on YouTube
- Link feast
- Oakeshottian Modes at the Crossroads of the Evolution Debates
- Mindscapes: First interview with a dead man
Previously...
- Self denial
- CEMI and meaning
- Are Babies Conscious?
- Bats without evolution – pt 2
- Bats without evolution – pt 1
- Interesting Stuff
- CEMI vindicated?
- Interesting Stuff
- Mind-meld rats
- Upon Thy Glimmering Thresholds
- Feral neurons
- Consciousness and agony
- If guns could kill
- Pockett redux
- Spaun
- Chomsky on AI
- Blind Brain
- Near death: a view from Hell
- The Cambridge Declaration
- Glockner’s Isthmus
- Oh, Phi!
- Libet plays ball
- Moral machines – thinking otherwise
- …but something is necessary
- Nothing could be better.
- The Stove of Consciousness
- A new light on computation
- Subliminal revolution
- Still HOT
- HOT death…
- The Unity of Consciousness
- Tallis vs Eagleman
- Brain on a chip
- Connectome
- Transferring Consciousness
- Crimes against consciousness
- Gofai’s not dead
- So I hear
- Crazyism
- Interesting stuff
- The Pongid Theory of Mind
- Smelling secret harmonies
- Retinoid Consciousness
- Output consciousness
- Zoned-out rat consciousness
- Pain without suffering
- What are we even talking about?
- Not Exactly Free
- When incredulities meet
- Closing the Gap
- Interesting stuff
- Thatter way to consciousness
- A unified theory of Consciousness
- Most Human
- Lies, damned lies, and statistics
- Beyond Libet
- Simples Consciousness
- Political consciousness
- Eagleman’s Law
- State Space and the Triumph of the Astrocytes
- Experimental Free Will
- Perplexities of Consciousness
- Mystery
- Ephaptic consciousness?
- Soul Dust
- God’s consciousness
- Impatience
- Technical difficulties
- Interesting Stuff
- What do you mean?
- Watson
- Interesting stuff
- Damasio jumps the shark?
- Octopus consciousness
- The Character of Consciousness
- More mereology
- Sciousness
- The Singularity
- The Consciousness Meter
- Unconscious Free Will?
- Footnote Consciousness
- Headless Consciousness
- Old skool consciousness
- Qualia: The Movie
- The consciousness substance.
- Interesting Stuff – July 2010
- Higgs Consciousness?
- Unconscious free will
- Self-assembly consciousness
- Sceptical sceptical folk theory theory theory
- Interesting stuff – May 2010
- Decomissioning Physicalism
- Monkey see?
- Heidegger vindicated?
- Google consciousness
- Global Workspace beats frame problem?
- Interesting stuff – March 2010
- AI Resurgent
- Introspection
- Phi
- Buy AI
- Interesting Stuff: December 2009
- Signatures of Consciousness
- The Ego Tunnel (pt 2)
- The Ego Tunnel (pt 1)
- Cognitive Planes
- Libet was wrong…?
- Bafflement
- Clockwork Orange syndrome?
- The Three Laws revisited
- Chaotic consciousness
- Dancing Pixies
- How wrong can I be?
- Panpsychist Consciousness
- Supersized Mind
- Forget AI…
- Abilities don’t matter
- Cryptic Consciousness
- On the level about computers and minds
- FORs, HORs, and unicorns
- New Turing tests
- Are determinists evil?
- Fear in a handful of dust?
- Radiotelepathy
- Technical issues
- Theory theory and other theories
- Ethical kill-bots
- Is intentionality non-computable?
- Whole Brain Emulation
- Consciousness: the new battleground for creationists?
- Loebner 2008
- Cognition Incorporated
- Nanointentionality
- Feelings about Jaynes
- Why am I me?
- Only integrate
- Language and Consciousness
- Alien Consciousness
- The Schemata of Ouroboros
- Consciousness as Hardware?
- Unconscious decisions
- More not the same
- Not the same
- Four zomboids
- Blue Brain – success?
- iCub iTalk?
- Baby pains
- Controllers in the brain
- Phantom Penises
- Egocentric Space
- What’s wrong with computation?
- Reincarnation
- Call me Four Brains
- Laughing computers
- The silence of the apes
- Testable quantum effects in the brain?
- Philosophy and Neuroscience
- Anthropomorphism
- Reflexive Monism
- Joycean Consciousness
- Benjamin Libet
- Teacups and mirrors
- Axioms of consciousness
- Lost in the Woods
- Back soon
- Animal problems
- Haecceity and metempsychosis
- I ain’t got no body
- Loopy
- Colour blind colours
- Down with Physics
- Update on Onphenes
- What, no kill-bots?
- What is this thing called love?
- Too thin? Too rich?
- Decoding Intentions
- Dimensions of mind
- All done with mirrors
- Mind the Gap
- The Genuine Problem
- Consciousness Yet to Come
- Idealist Consciousness
- Magic Scanners
- Does ‘Consciousness’ Exist?
- A Spectrum of Consciousness
- The upgrade
- Me do it
- The Narcissus Syndrome
- Tandem triumphans
- Seeing Red
- I feel it in my blood
- Bayesian Consciousness
- Ignorance is the answer
- Push Singh
- Non-spatial consciousness
- Where do I begin?
- The deepest woo-woo
- Anaesthetic Entanglement
- Paths of Consciousness
- Onphenes
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- October 2005
- January 2005
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
1. Cornel Slenters says:
Hello Peter,
May 4, 2011, 3:54 pmI have just added an article at my website regarding the solution of the consciousness ‘hard problem’ as defined by David Chalmers. The direct link to the article is http://www.slenters.ch/poschalmers
There is plenty of other material on the above website that would fit with the context of your website.
Maybe something to write about.
I required, I will be happy to make an editorial contribution.
Enjoy,
Cornel Slenters
2. Andrew Jefferson says:
Highly interesting many thanks, It looks like your current followers would possibly want a great deal more blog posts like this carry on the good hard work.
September 10, 2011, 5:44 am